Draft a service level agreement and complete a problem review for a client renewal
You are the service delivery coordinator.
What has happened
Merriwa Medical Centre's managed service contract renews in November. The practice manager has raised two concerns: the practice management software has frozen several times after vendor updates, and afternoon tickets are slow to get a response. Marcus Feld wants a draft service level agreement for the renewal with response and resolution targets, reporting and review meetings, and a problem review of the last three months of Merriwa tickets that finds root causes and states the improvements Nova will commit to. He also wants the current procedures checked to make sure they support what the agreement promises, with any updates recommended.
Deliverables
- Problem review with root causes
- Draft service level agreement
- Procedure update recommendations
- Client facing summary
- Presentation notes for the Chief Executive Officer
Documents to use
Systems to use
Service Desk Tickets
The ticket queue for incidents and service requests from every managed client with priority, owner and status.
Change Request Register
The record of normal and emergency changes to client and Nova production systems with risk, approval, window and result.
Project Register
The list of client and internal projects with scope, budget, stage, project manager and next milestone.
Units of competency
Current on training.gov.au for the Information and Communications Technology as at 10 September 2026.
ICTICT440Develop service level agreementsICTSAS527Manage client problemsICTICT446Apply ICT service management principlesICTSAS433Update ICT client support procedures and assist with policy developmentQualifications
ICT40120Certificate IV in Information TechnologyICT50220Diploma of Information TechnologyWhat to look for
Evidence guide
Look for a problem review that distinguishes incidents from problems and identifies root causes supported by ticket and change evidence. The agreement must have measurable targets, clear priority definitions and reporting. Procedure recommendations must connect directly to the problems found. The client summary must be plain and honest about what went wrong.